https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #3 from Jarod Wilson jarod@redhat.com --- Some further reading on the licensing issue and a bit of back-channel discussion, and what I now believe to be the thing to do for #7 is "License: GPLv2 or BSD", rename COPYING to LICENSE-GPL and include a new LICENSE-BSD file so the text of both licenses is easily distributable with the binaries. The only GPLv3+ files are config/config.*, which aren't part of the distributed binaries, and License: is only in reference to distributed binaries, so no reference to GPLv3+ is required here.