Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) Alias: bitgtkmm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192052
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-29 20:07 EST ------- 8--> It's there. It's in the standard devel line, right above the specific requires that I add for bitgtkmm: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} <--8
D'oh!
8-->
Blocker : run rpm -qa --requires on the installed bitgtkmm. Quite a lot of the output are for standard libs, but you cannot rely on people having gtkmm installed (or a few of the others)
Those are all added by rpmbuild. <--8
No. These are packages required to run. Say I didn't have atkmm on my machine (just as an example). Without the R atkmm being explictly states in the spec file, the package would know no better until it gets to a point that atkmm is needed and then it falls over dead.
I had a similar problem with Anjuta-1.2.4a a while back in that gtkmm was not in as an explicit R. However, when you came to try and create a gtkmm package, the software complained like crazy. Add the R line for gtkmm and everything was happy again.