https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2136778
Ben Beasley code@musicinmybrain.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |code@musicinmybrain.net
--- Comment #10 from Ben Beasley code@musicinmybrain.net --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #7)
No, the packager does not need to repeat the %license thing if the license file is already part of --licensefiles.
There is no rule nor recommendation to have licenses in /usr/share/licenses/, the only rule is to make them with %license and %pyproject_save_files already does that, if upstream has the correct metadata.
See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/ #_example_spec_file and look up %license.
This comes up a *lot*. I’d like to propose that we explicitly clarify this point in the Licensing Guidelines, but I haven’t yet figured out how to word it without making the relevant section too verbose and meandering.