Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795696
--- Comment #6 from Terje Røsten terjeros@phys.ntnu.no 2012-02-25 03:56:51 EST --- - It's normal to have any %global on top. - %description still have to long lines - license field is not correct, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses - there is *always* a srpm, and in fact the most important package for a reviewer :-) - the %changelog is still empty...
Have you seen this document: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines