Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582
--- Comment #16 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fedora@gmail.com 2010-02-13 13:47:04 EST --- Thanks, we are almost there. I have a few questions, comments and a few minor issues:
? The only rpmlint is: dpkg.src:1: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib which is ironically a lot better than our own rpm package. Anyway, rpmlint is an rpmlint. I fail to understand that why we hardcode the libdir to /usr/lib. I read your comment, but is it not possible to patch those perl scripts to look at /usr/share instead of /usr/lib?
On the other hand our rpm package also puts files in /usr/lib. I wonder if this is really a must.
! The devel package looks like it can be made noarch. I don't know if this would screw up our build system though. (Meanwhile dpkg and dselect packages cannot be noarch)
* The following directories and possibly their subdirectories are not owned: /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Debian/ %dpkgdir/dpkg/methods/
* Build process log does not show us what flags are used during compilation. Please make it verbose.