Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546666
Marek Mahut mmahut@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mmahut@redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |mmahut@redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Marek Mahut mmahut@redhat.com 2010-01-03 06:20:19 EDT --- - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - Spec file matches base package name. - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - Licenses field in spec matches the content of tarball - License file included in package matches used code (the code is provided under 3 different licenses) - BuildRequires are correct (tests will depend on selenium-server once imported, also see comment #2) - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - Rpmlint is clean. - Builds in mock for rawhide.
This package looks sane, approved.