Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757156
--- Comment #3 from Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak kas@fi.muni.cz 2011-12-02 10:18:00 EST --- Re: comment #1
Hello Willington, thanks for the review!
I think spelling errors reported by rpmlint are not valid. I have updated the .spec and src.rpm file to fix the directory ownership problem you have reported. It would be nice to have cpanspec modified so that it generated a .spec file which actually follows the guidelines. I will report the issue to the cpanspec package.
As for the license text: perl modules often refer to the license of Perl itself (dual GPL+Artistic). This one explicitly states only Artistic license (which makes sense for smallish modules like this one).
Re: comment #2
I have joined the list and let them know about this package.