Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725905
--- Comment #3 from Stef Walter stefw@collabora.co.uk 2011-07-27 03:28:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2)
Stef, by what name are applications supposed to look up the library if they want to use it as a PKCS11 proxy module? Should we be installing the libp11-kit.so symlink in the main package so that applications could dlopen() it using that name?
That sounds like a good plan. I look at putting this into p11-kit upstream.
Also, are you aware that using Apache License 2.0 code makes the whole library incompatible with GPLv2-only code?
Hmmm, that's true. I'll rewrite the bits that came from apr, and then we can get rid of this issue.