https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648728
Petr Viktorin pviktori@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(christof@damian.n | |et) | |needinfo?(tuanta@iwayvietna | |m.com) | |needinfo?(pviktori@redhat.c | |om) |
--- Comment #20 from Petr Viktorin pviktori@redhat.com --- Hello, and apologies for the delay.
If the progressbar and progressbar2 upstreams diverge, we'll be in quite a tough spot. But for now, it seems progressbar2 is better maintained, and wants to keep compatibility with the original.
So, let's replace python3-progressbar by python3-progressbar2. The python2 package is going away soon though; let's keep that as it is.
Ankur, if it works for you, can you: - post a heads-up to Fedora-devel, CCing maintainers of the dependent packages and the other progressbar admins (tuanta, cdamian), saying what the plan is
- remove the python2-progressbar2 subpackage entirely from the spec (this should simplify it quite a bit!)
- make python3-progressbar2 replace python3-progressbar (using versioned Obsoletes & Provides)
- get it approved
- please, add me as a co-maintainer
- let me know so I can remove the python3-progressbar package