https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867290
--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com --- Thanks, Andy, for picking up this review. Yeah I was worrying a bit about the license too, since it is unusual. PLD marked it BSD so I went with that in the first instance.
It is indeed the same license as used by the once famous c-news (usenet newserver) software.
The license is also listed here: https://www.openhub.net/licenses/cnews
I also don't see any serious problem with it, but probably it is most correct that I post it to the Fedora Legal list to get their awareness of it.
It might need a separate license tag, I dunno, since it does seem differ enough from BSD texts.