Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204975
Milan Crha mcrha@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mcrha@redhat.com
--- Comment #9 from Milan Crha mcrha@redhat.com 2010-03-18 08:36:27 EDT --- As this is assigned to a review of vigra-1.6.0-2.1, then I'm using it for my question:
I see that .spec file has spec license MIT, same as is shown in the LICENSE.txt file, but the "License features" says "Source code: Adobe". I guess it should be also "Source code: MIT", shouldn't it?
Apart of this the .spec file looks good from my point of view.