Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492946
--- Comment #6 from Mat Booth fedora@matbooth.co.uk 2009-04-02 06:26:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5)
Mat, What do you think about dropping the gcj_support? It is giving us nothing as eclipse itself is compiled without it. And benefits for us will be a lot simpler spec file, faster compilation, noarch packages and etc.
I don't have a problem with dropping GCJ support. (Though I don't think it made the spec too much more complicated ;-) ) In these days of stronger, better, faster JDKs, are AOT bits desired in any Java package? If not, we probably ought to change the guidelines. [1]
However, try this one on for size:
Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-dltk.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-dltk-1.0.0-0.2.M5.fc10.src.rp...
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GCJGuidelines