Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481
------- Additional Comments From mhideo@redhat.com 2008-01-10 21:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19)
(In reply to comment #18)
As per comment 11, I strongly recommend creating a separate package for docbook-xsl and making this review depend on it so as not to further delay this review.
This package is dependent on this exact version of the xsl and is smaller than many source packages currently in Fedora.
see: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/source/SRPMS/
It may be worth raising the naming issue on fedora-packaging list.
I think that whole discussion is ridiculous, pointless and a complete waste of time. I'll see if I can convince the manager in question to reconsider this push.
Hey, Jeff.
It's cool. We'll get it sorted out.
I really appreciate everything you have done for open-source in the last 3 years. You have created a toolchain that has enabled the 48 folks using it to generate more open-source content than any other project in the history of open-source. You have done things that no-one else has done and you did so without ever drawing attention to yourself and your immense contributions.
There are a 179 make files that need to be edited and 4117 documentation sets in 23 languages that need to be recompiled. I know it is non-trivial and a world of work to re-do 2 years worth of work in 2 days.
Let me check the community of use around the documentation-devel package and see what their thougths are on taking this burden completely on themselves to redo.
Thank you again, Jeff and apologies to the Jens/Patrice/Parang for the distraction. Honestly had no idea the impact this name would have on fedora.
- Mike