[Bug 2224957] Review Request: rust-alsa - Thin but safe wrappers for ALSA (Linux sound API)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224957

Fabio Valentini <decathorpe(a)gmail.com&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |POST
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+
           Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org    |decathorpe(a)gmail.com
                 CC|                            |decathorpe(a)gmail.com



--- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe(a)gmail.com&gt; ---
Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review.

- package builds and installs without errors on rawhide
- test suite is run and all unit tests pass
- latest version of the crate is packaged
- license matches upstream specification (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) and is acceptable
for Fedora
- license file is included with %license in %files
- package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines

Package APPROVED.

===

Recommended post-import rust-sig tasks:

- set up package on release-monitoring.org:
  project: $crate
  homepage: https://crates.io/crates/$crate
  backend: crates.io
  version scheme: semantic
  version filter: alpha;beta;rc;pre
  distro: Fedora
  Package: rust-$crate

- add @rust-sig with "commit" access as package co-maintainer
  (should happen automatically)

- set bugzilla assignee overrides to @rust-sig (optional)

- track package in koschei for all built branches
  (should happen automatically once rust-sig is co-maintainer)

===

It would be great if you could do some reviews in return.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224957

Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...