https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2344534
--- Comment #21 from wojnilowicz lukasz.wojnilowicz@gmail.com --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #18)
I'm still not sure what it brings you to have the source package name be "awatcher" but the package that users actually install be "aw-awatcher". It's a source package that builds one single binary package. Making their names different just creates complications. But if this is a hill you want to die on, that's fine, I guess ...
Thanks. I just stick with the naming of the upstream project. One can not go bad with that.
Should some more watchers appear in the future under the name "awatcher", then I wouldn't have to rename the source package.