https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149430
--- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember klember@redhat.com --- Yes, good points. I don't think there is a clear winner here: On one hand it would be nice to match the upstream "syndication-domination" source package name, on the other hand making the source package name wildly different from the binary package can also be confusing (especially when reporting bugs against the package).
I'm really fine either way, so if you strongly prefer "syndication-domination" I'd be happy to use that name.