Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jcip-annotations - Java 5 thread safety annotations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=262401
------- Additional Comments From loganjerry@gmail.com 2007-09-19 00:17 EST ------- Thanks for the comments. I changed the name and version number as suggested.
For the javadocs, I just unconditionally build them (because not every arch will have IcedTea, so the check with %{fedora} is insufficient). The package description for the javadocs notes that on systems with sinjdoc, the package contains nothing useful.
As for the Group tag, I don't understand the problem. On my machine, there are 64 packages in that group (e.g., axis, bcel, castor, jrefactory), and I certainly have not installed all of the Java packages available from Fedora. Why should the final '/Java' be dropped?
The new files are here: Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jcip-annotations/jcip-annotations.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jcip-annotations/jcip-annotations-0-20060626....