Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782560
--- Comment #15 from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda bkabrda@redhat.com 2012-02-20 01:52:04 EST --- (In reply to comment #14)
I updated the spec file to do prep/build/install more in line with the draft guidelines (minus the typos in the draft that make it fail).
I gave up on el5, as rubygems there is a bit too old. but this should work on el6 and any supported fedora releases. If we could update rubygems just a little on el5, it'd work there too.
Spec file: http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/specs/rubygem-ruby-shadow.spec
The process of creating the new guidelines is still going on. The ruby-sig people are mostly arguing against the unpacking and then repacking the gem, as it is an unnecessary payload. If you don't need to patch the C extension, this really just makes the spec longer and harder to read. I suggest getting rid of it.