Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173
--- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2008-12-02 10:34:44 EDT --- I don't know; I'm not going to pretend that I've understood what comment #14 means, and I haven't seen an explicit comment from the submitter of this ticket directly answering the issue I raised in the initial review regarding whether or not the -devel package ends up being required at runtime. All I got was "Beats me" and then several comments regarding DT_SONAME which I might research more deeply if I didn't have 30 other review tickets in flight at the moment.