https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456
--- Comment #15 from Pavel Alexeev pahan@hubbitus.info --- (In reply to Julien Enselme from comment #14)
According to logs its at least does not fail:
- /usr/bin/python2 setup.py test
But according to the logs, it doesn't launch any tests.
According to the logs, it happened when you tried to launch the tests with setup.py. Your previous build worked and I just tested with fedora-review and encountered no problem.
Does run nothing but require addition dependency? :)
docutil mentioned as dep even in setup.py from pupi tarball.
And since there is not tag nor release on github (https://github.com/rtfd/recommonmark), I cannot take the source from github. For 0.4.0 there isn't even a commit telling me which revision to take. So I think I'm stuck with sources from pypi.
First is very easy way. You may not search point when such tarball was created, but include current master state following post-release naming scheme: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/Namin...
I have not see sense to do that, but if you want provide exactly 0.4.0 commit it very easy to find for that project as it have small amount of commits: It is https://github.com/rtfd/recommonmark/commit/7ca5247b342e755ce5294d43b5fef68a... where version was bumped. Next commit https://github.com/rtfd/recommonmark/commit/06bf23745e83abf1161b369046c6a38f... in file which is not in pupi tarball at all, and next one absent: https://github.com/rtfd/recommonmark/commit/d0560b1693a3e5641524daab331a1a2f...
So, 7ca5247b342e755ce5294d43b5fef68afd90028e is what you look for.
Even it include tests and license file.