https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114146
--- Comment #12 from Vít Ondruch vondruch@redhat.com --- (In reply to Julian C. Dunn from comment #11)
This all seems reasonable. I updated it to rubygem-ffi-yajl 2.3.1 and rebuilt it
There is missing changelog entry, but this is just minor nit.
Are we good to go on this now?
Well, I am, but since I proposed this, I don't think I am eligible to approve this.
BTW it would be probably better to have the runtime dependency directly on the libyajl library instead of the package, i.e.:
~~~ Requires: libyajl.so.2()%{_isa} ~~~