[Bug 428368] Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite
Alias: fedora-ds

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428368

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2008-02-06 17:54 EST -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > Unfortunately, I don't think it can be a noarch package, because most of its
> > dependencies are arch specific packages (fedora-ds-base, fedora-ds-admin).  How
> > would that work?
>
> We don't care about the architecture of dependencies.

So if I do
yum install fedora-ds

on an x86_64 system, what happens?  Does it pull in fedora-ds-base.x86_64 or
fedora-ds-base.i386?  If the latter, and I really want (and expect since I'm
running on an x86_64 system) to get fedora-ds-base.x86_64 picked up as a
dependency, how does that work?