Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714
--- Comment #52 from Lorenzo Villani lvillani@binaryhelix.net 2010-08-23 06:48:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #51)
So, by that very logic, it should be "satsolver-libs" in Fedora.
AFAIK, the "-libs" suffix is used when an application also happens to ship libraries usable by 3rd parties. So for pure libraries only "name" and "name-devel" are necessary, IIRC.
Feel free to suggest; discussion was already started on similar hot topic http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-buildservice/2010-07/msg00179.html
Following the "if it ain't broken, don't fix it" motto, I'd like to push this package as "satsolver" (not "sat-solver") and rename it only if needed.