Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458994
--- Comment #2 from Nigel Jones dev@nigelj.com 2008-08-14 01:13:44 EDT --- MUST: Y: rpmlint on each package Y: Meeting Package Naming Guidelines Y: Spec file name matches base package name Y: License field is valid Y: Meets Packaging Guidelines Y: License included in package (if included in source) Y: Spec file written in en_US Y: Spec file is legible Y: Sources match upstream source Y: Source URL 'sane' Y: Compiles successfully - [noarch] -: ExcludeArch required? Y: All Build Dependencies Listed -: Handles locales sanely -: Library packages run ldconfig Y: Package is not relocatable Y: Package owns all directories created Y: No duplicate file listings Y: defattr set correctly Y: %clean is used Y: Macro use conisistant Y: ONLY Contains Code/Content that is allowed -: Large Documentation in -doc subpackage Y: %doc must not affect package runtime -: Header files in -devel -: Static libraries in -static -: pkgconfig files require pkgconfig -: Library files are located in correct package -: -devel requires base package w/ fully versioned dependency -: Packages do not contact .la (libtool) archives Y: GUI Apps have .desktop files Y: No duplicate directory ownerships Y: %install cleans buildroot Y: Filenames are valid UTF-8
SHOULD: -: Description/Summary sections contain translations Y: Builds in mock/koji Y: Builds on all architectures Y: Program works upon testing Y: Scriptlets are sane -: Subpackages require base package -: pkgconfig.pc files in -devel -: File dependencies should only be in /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin
APPROVED