Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682355
--- Comment #3 from Sergio Belkin sebelk@gmail.com 2011-03-07 00:03:08 EST --- In reply to comment #2)
Hi Yader
I'd been fixed the packages now available in:
Spec URL: http://yaderv.fedorapeople.org/rpm/amigo/amigo.spec SRPM URL: http://yaderv.fedorapeople.org/rpm/amigo/amigo-1.0-1.fc14.src.rpm
the rpm lint output is:
amigo.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) spanish -> Spanish The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
amigo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US spanish -> Spanish The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
amigo.src: W: strange-permission amigo.sh 0775L A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
I changed the permissions to 0775 to amigo.sh due is executable
-You meant 0755 isn't it? :)
-You should update the everytime you submit new files.
Look at this rpmlint output, my obs prefixed with "-" :
[sergio@peque usr]$ rpmlint -i -vv /var/lib/mock/fedora-14-i386/root/builddir/build/RPMS/amigo-1.0-1.fc14.noarch.rpm amigo.noarch: I: checking amigo.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) spanish -> Spanish The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
amigo.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US spanish -> Spanish The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
amigo.noarch: I: checking-url http://gnomecoder.wordpress.com/amigo/ (timeout 10 seconds) amigo.noarch: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files.
- Perhaps a README would be useful, you may ask to upstream to provide some documentation.
amigo.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/amigo This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the executable bits or move the file elsewhere.
- It would be nicer this file content (in order to get rid of this warning) as follows: #!/usr/bin/ruby /usr/share/amigo/amigo.rb
amigo.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary amigo Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings.
HTH