[Bug 782560] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-shadow - *nix Shadow Password Module

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782560

--- Comment #36 from Moses Mendoza  ---
Hi Vit,

I've updated per your comments, here:
https://s3.amazonaws.com/rubygemshadow/2.2.0/rubygem-ruby-shadow-2.2.0-1.fc1...
https://s3.amazonaws.com/rubygemshadow/2.2.0/rubygem-ruby-shadow.spec

with the exception of:
> %{ruby_version}
> I already expressed my concerns about %{ruby_version} above and they still
> apply.

I agree with Tim regarding the maintainability/difficulty of back-porting
statically assigned ruby pathing.
> %install section
> Wouldn't be better to install just files of interest instead of copying
> everything and then doing clean up?

I did this, but it seemed less clean than it was before. Either way is fine
with me, and I'm welcome to better ways to accomplish it than I used.
> Since the package will not own any file, it could be noarch at the end?
> This is weird :)

I agree, it does seem strange. I left it as is, for now, but am fine with
updating to noarch if this is a requirement.