Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609012
--- Comment #8 from Michal Ingeli mi@v3.sk 2010-11-05 06:20:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
- Project name and package name consistency GoodData-CL Vs. gooddata-cl
- Build failed for f13 [1]
F13 is too old.
and also f14 [2].
Fixed.
Ok. Builds fine.
gooddata-cl.src: W: strange-permission gooddata-cli 0755L
- file listed in %{_bindir}, rpmlint shouldn't be complaining
Well this is about the Source file. Fixed.
OK.
- missing BuildDeps reported by koji:
DEBUG util.py:260: No Package Found for axis >= 1.4 DEBUG util.py:260: No Package Found for javacc-maven-plugin DEBUG util.py:260: No Package Found for xpp3-minimal >= 1.1.3.8-3.4 DEBUG util.py:260: No Package Found for xstream >= 1.3.1 DEBUG util.py:260: No Package Found for json-lib DEBUG util.py:260: No Package Found for gdata-java > 1.39
This is on F13. That's too old.
Ok. So this package is not stated for F13 and older, EL5 and older.
- License OK. - Packager is not using and installing maven dependency maps, so [1] is not required. - Missing buildroot tag is OK, package is NOT for ancient releases.
* few more rpmlint warnings:
* E: explicit-lib-dependency json-lib Can rpm figure out the dependency by itself?
* W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gooddata-cl/log4j.configuration Consider adding %config
* W: class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/java/gooddata-cl/cli-1.1.4.jar
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#maven