https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048258
José Matos jamatos@fc.up.pt changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |jamatos@fc.up.pt Flags| |fedora-review+ CC| |jamatos@fc.up.pt
--- Comment #1 from José Matos jamatos@fc.up.pt --- Taking the review.
The license is correct and appropriated for Fedora. The spec file is simple and follows the Fedora guidelines. fedora-review does not find any real issue [*], and neither do I so the package is approved.
[*] the only issue it raise is due to the use of the auto macros, where it complains that %dist is not used.