https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196037
Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- - rpmlint checks return:
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files.
Would be nice but may not exist individually for each subpackage.
- package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license ( ASL 2.0 ) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file
Very clean.
APPROVED.