https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458247
--- Comment #4 from Vitaly Zaitsev vitaly@easycoding.org --- Manual checks:
Generic: [ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
Pass.
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 37 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/vitaly/1458247-translate- shell/licensecheck.txt
Pass. But you should ask upstream to add Public Domain preamble to source files.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
Pass.
[ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.
Pass.
[ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
Pass.
[ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
Pass. N/a.
[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
Pass.
[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
Pass.
[ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
Pass.
[ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
Pass.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
Pass.
[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
Pass.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present.
Pass.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
Pass.
[ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
Pass.
[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
Pass. N/a.
[ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
Pass. N/a.
[ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 3 files.
Pass.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
Pass.