Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526014
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pahan@hubbitus.info changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pahan@hubbitus.info 2010-07-29 06:18:05 EDT --- Ok, source now correct: $ md5sum kprof-1.4.3.tar.bz2 kprof-1.4.3.tar.bz2.downloaded d2b1286f8fea7eb1d3e67215e07d296f kprof-1.4.3.tar.bz2 d2b1286f8fea7eb1d3e67215e07d296f kprof-1.4.3.tar.bz2.downloaded.
I have not RHEL or CentOS machine with X now to test, but on Fedora 13 it failed start too. So, if it does not intended for Fedora at all (what is very sorry).
Package APPROVED.
--- Comment #8 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pahan@hubbitus.info 2010-07-29 06:18:06 EDT --- Ok, source now correct: $ md5sum kprof-1.4.3.tar.bz2 kprof-1.4.3.tar.bz2.downloaded d2b1286f8fea7eb1d3e67215e07d296f kprof-1.4.3.tar.bz2 d2b1286f8fea7eb1d3e67215e07d296f kprof-1.4.3.tar.bz2.downloaded.
I have not RHEL or CentOS machine with X now to test, but on Fedora 13 it failed start too. So, if it does not intended for Fedora at all (what is very sorry) I think it is not big problem.
Package APPROVED.