https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700559
Adam Jackson ajax@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |ajax@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Adam Jackson ajax@redhat.com ---
Provides: xorg-x11-drv-intel-devel intel-gpu-tools Obsoletes: xorg-x11-drv-intel-devel intel-gpu-tools
These should be versioned, in the unlikely event we ever reintroduce packages with those names. Something like:
%define provobs_version 2.99.917-42 Provides: xorg-x11-drv-intel-devel = %{provobs_version} Obsoletes: xorg-x11-drv-intel-devel < %{provobs_version} # same for intel-gpu-tools
I picked -42 here to be newer than the current intel driver version.
%description igt-gpu-tools (formally known as intel-gpu-tools) is the standard for writing test cases for DRM drivers. It also includes a handful of useful tools for various drivers, such as Intel's GPU tools for i915.
"formally" should probably be "formerly" here.
%{_libdir}/intel_aubdump.so %{_libdir}/libigt.so %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/intel-gen4asm.pc
It's probably overkill to split these out to a devel subpackage since I don't really expect any external projects to use them. However, Fedora really prefers that real DSOs (not -devel symlinks, and not dlopen-only things like DRI drivers) be versioned, even if it's libblah.so.0. Would be good to push that upstream if you can. Debian has a similar policy so this isn't just Fedora being weird.