Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401
------- Additional Comments From rmeggins@redhat.com 2006-07-17 13:57 EST -------
- standard practice in Fedora is to symlink back to the actual .so rather
than create a trail of symlinks
I'm not sure what this means?
- unversioned .so files must go in -devel package when there are
also versioned .so's
But then if someone links an app against libldap50.so (in the devel package), how does the app find libldap50.so at runtime when it doesn't exist on the system, only libldap50.so.5.17?
- rpmlint complains about invalid sonames, I presume this is a side-effect
of renaming them:
E: mozldap invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libssldap-5.0.so.5.17 libssldap50.so E: mozldap invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libprldap-5.0.so.5.17 libprldap50.so E: mozldap invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libldap-5.0.so.5.17 libldap50.so
Where do /usr/lib64/libssldap-5.0.so.5.17 and the others come from? All of my lib names should begin with lib[ss,pr]ldap50