https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276549
--- Comment #16 from Xavier Bertaux bertauxx@gmail.com --- Hi solomoncyl,
following the last email received, I modified the license by GPL-3.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-or-later AND CC-BY-SA-4.0 since part of the code uses the GPL2 license (old code) and another uses the GPL3 license and the datas are under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license to avoid any warning.
For the ambiguity on the COPYING.txt file (which corresponds to the GPL2 license I also modified in the file section so that it is taken as a license (following the procedure).
I just uploaded the two files to the same place so the links remain the same.
I did not increment the version number Release: 1%{?dist} tell me if this is necessary as it is or not
Cheers Xavier