https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2137159
--- Comment #8 from Nils Philippsen nphilipp@redhat.com --- Another case in point of having separate packages for different major versions is the changes in how tempo maps are implemented in 7.x vs. 6.x -- see https://tracker.ardour.org/view.php?id=9030#c26705
This was sort of a deliberate decision. The structure of the tempo map in 7.0 is radically different, and for now we opted to not correctly support 6.x sessions with the first tempo marker at 0.
However, we may be able to fix this at some point.
You should use 6.9 to continue working on such sessions.
(In reply to Guido Aulisi from comment #7)
Some items need extra investigation:
Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. This is clearly not true, but we need to ship GPLv3 license file
Yeah, that's just due to how the licenses of Ardour itself and bundled code are combined.
Large data in /usr/share/ardour7 Can we split it to a no arch sub package?
Sure!
Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. I think this is due to autospec
Yes, it is.