Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: viewmtn - Web interface for Monotone version control system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435842
------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny@gmx.de 2008-03-14 15:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4)
I'm just trying to follow Fedora packaging guidelines.
Which clearly say, that FHS is to follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-e1c5548cbbe551c7a43d... and any deviation from that should be rationalized in the review process. That's all I'm trying to do.
With the sense of the symlink inverted, I cannot get the package to build because of unpackaged /etc/*.py[oc] files.
You have a point here. We probably should bug upstream (later, that is), to find a cleaner solution for configuring ViewMTN. I will ask Grahame.
But you didn't answer my two questions: - What is the purpose of the symlink in /etc? - How do you prevent the config file %{python_sitelib}/viewmtn/user_config.py from being overwritten during an update?
The database sharing really is not a simple problem, I told you the truth.
Already said that I'm not insisting on that.