https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161003
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Kadlčík jkadlcik@redhat.com ---
[ ]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec.
One last thing that needs to be fixed. You can see how others did the "licensing breakdown" https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bitwise/blob/rawhide/f/bitwise.spec https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/river/blob/rawhide/f/river.spec
It will be a +1 after that. So there is a topic that I would like to bring forward.
Since this would be your first Fedora package, you will need to get sponsored into the `packager' group before this package can be accepted.
I would like to sponsor you.
That would make it my responsibility to guide you through the processes that you will do, and the tools that you will need as a package maintainer. I would also be there to answer your packaging-related questions, or to help you find somebody who knows the answers.
Your responsibilities as a future package maintainer are explained here https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Package_maintainer_responsibiliti...
To make sure a person is able to fulfill the package maintainer responsibilities, we usually stick to this process https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Packager_sponsor_policy/#requirem...
I am sending you an email with some follow-up information and my contact information. But for the sake of full transparency, there are also other packager sponsors, so you can reach out to them if you prefer to do so. They might be busy though. https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-sponsors/active