Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630
--- Comment #37 from Chen Lei supercyper@163.com 2010-01-28 13:14:42 EST --- (In reply to comment #36)
Well, I don't know which changelog you are talking about but the version jogl 1.1 tarball has both gluegen and jogl together. You can create separate packages of them without any problems. If you are talking about jogl 2.0, it is still a dev version and there are several problems with it:
- a lot of changes occurred in the API
- the last modifications on jogl git are three months old.
- there is not ETA on the release of a stable version (I tried a few time to
contact upstream about that and about contributing to jogl but I never received any answer) For all these reasons, jogl 1.1 should be packaged first.
If so, I think we can create a jogl1 package instead of jogl to push jogl 1.1 to the fedora repo like qt3 and qt(qt4). What is the version of gluegen that included in jogl 1.1 tarball?
About the prerequirements, I don't know any dependencies of Scilab using jing.jar or jimi.jar ?!
There is a Prerequirements to compile Scilab 5.2.0 from scilab's site. See http://www.scilab.org/download/