Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982
Bruno Cornec bruno_cornec@hp.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bruno_cornec@hp.com
--- Comment #12 from Bruno Cornec bruno_cornec@hp.com 2008-10-03 08:14:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11)
In order to make tracking easier for everyone, please bump the release tag each time you modify the spec file (and _add_ a corresponding changelog entry, not _replace_ the previous one as you have done). For instance
Ok, the next one is -3 now so.
%changelog
- Thu Oct 02 2008 Bruno Cornec bruno@project-builder.org 1.19-2.fc9
- fix compilation flags
- Sat Sep 20 2008 Bruno Cornec bruno@project-builder.org 1.19-1.fc9
- Updated to 1.19
Ok. Will try to do that properly for -3 tag. In fact I have a fake changelog I generate for test packages, and a real one for official packages. Now we are approaching that step, it makes sense.
as of 02.oct.2008, ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/9/buffer.spec still has the missing "s" in Summary(fr).
My mistake, I wasn't looking at the right line.
For my own knowledge what is the tool you're using for conformity checking. I just know rpmlint. What else exists ?
I will take a look at your other packages and if satisfied I will sponsor you.
Thanks.
So new versions available at: ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/9/buffer.spec and ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/9/buffer-1.19-3.fc9.src.rpm