https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168511
--- Comment #10 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala huzaifas@redhat.com --- (In reply to Pekka Pietikäinen from comment #7)
I doubt anyone wants owl separately packaged, so to 100% comply with all open source guidelines could just include owl in the src.rpm and build owl, rebuild radamsa.c and then build that.
I or Niranjan can package owl separately, i am sure it will prove useful, otherwise as well :)
Or verify whether fedora blob exception magic could apply here and use upstream radamsa.c like you did here :-)
Radamsa git has a license file already, will poke to see whether a 0.3.1 or so with it is possible (or if he's ready to release 0.4)