https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242971
--- Comment #36 from Davide Cavalca davide@cavalca.name --- Looks like this breaks fedora-review because of the %include usage.
Source1: pt_dirs.txt Source2: pt_devel_headers.txt Source3: pt_python.txt
Please add comments to document how these were generated (or even better, generate them with a script and run that in %install instead like the systemd package does).
Summary: An AI/ML python package
As the comment above mentioned, this needs to match the summary in the review title; if you want it to include PyTorch for visibility, I'd suggest something like "PyTorch AI/ML framework".
# auto reviewer not happy with : BSD-0-Clause AND Khronos
Neither of these are valid SPDX names. BSD-0-Clause is most likely 0BSD (https://spdx.org/licenses/0BSD.html). As for Khronos, you should submit that one for review at https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data as I don't see it in the list of allowed licenses (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/).
# Limit to these because they are well behaved with clang ExclusiveArch: x86_64 aarch64 %global toolchain clang
Is this an upstream limitation? We definitely have other packages using clang that build find on all arches.
# And they need to be stripped
Why are we manually stripping stuff in %install?