https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880953
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Maier andreas.r.maier@gmx.de --- I'm very sorry for not having followed up on this - I simply missed it and Tony Asleson pointed me to it.
On your review comments:
* "Please bump to 1.0.3": I have bumped the version to 1.0.4, the currently released version.
* "Files are 404": I'm not sure I understand what to fix here. The files will be pulled in during the package build process, as I understand it. Can you elaborate?
* "You don't need to specify the BuildRequires twice": I removed the first section of them, following the example at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_example_p.... However, being a beginner in package maintenance, I don't fully understand the package structure yet w.r.t. Python 2 and Python 3. I understand that the current Fedora release does not contain any Python 2 packages anymore. So why is there still a %package statement for a python3-* package name when there is already a Name definition for the python-* package name? What is the strategy for new Python packages in Fedora, should they be named python3-* or python-*?
In addition, I changed:
* Source to Source0
* Used "python%{python3_pkgversion}-" instead of "python3-". I found that in several upstream packages, e.g. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-isort/blob/rawhide/f/python-isort....
The resulting spec file has been updated on the master branch of the upstream repo at: