https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265685
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek@in.waw.pl changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |zbyszek@in.waw.pl Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #29 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek@in.waw.pl --- rpmlint is quite helpful: sylfilter.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libsylfilter.so
.so is packaged in both subpackages. It should be present only in the -devel supbackage. Common trick is to %{_libdir}/libsylfilter.so.* in the main subpackage.
sylfilter-devel.i686: W: tag-in-description C Requires: sylfilter-devel.i686: W: tag-in-description C Requires: You should move the Requires tag above %description because they're being interpreted as the part of the text.
/usr/lib/libsylfilter.la should be removed after installation [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#StaticLibraries].
I looked over all the other comments, and it seems everything that other reviews noted was fixed. It looks very clean now.