https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149430
--- Comment #6 from Michael Catanzaro mcatanza@redhat.com --- (In reply to Kalev Lember from comment #4)
Yes, good points. I don't think there is a clear winner here: On one hand it would be nice to match the upstream "syndication-domination" source package name, on the other hand making the source package name wildly different from the binary package can also be confusing (especially when reporting bugs against the package).
Yeah I know. It's your call, but my vote is for "syndication-domination" as it's more future-proof and easier to find the upstream project. But yes, that indeed makes it harder to find the source package from the binary package. There's no winning here. :/