Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537454
Lubomir Rintel lkundrak@v3.sk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak@v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |lkundrak@v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel lkundrak@v3.sk 2009-11-21 18:56:38 EDT --- * Package name and version are in accordance with packaging guidelines * SPEC file clean, legible and well-commented * License tag correct, license packaged as %doc * RPMLint happy * a couple of warnings spelling errors in fc13, all of them false positives * Filelist okay, for directories it uses and does now it depends on packages that provide them * Provides/Require list ok * Built fine in mock (with dependency repository added)
Objections:
1.) Why do you check stuff out from CVS?
2.) Please don't pretty-format the Description, please use complete sentences. It does not always look well in package management front-ends.