https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2264463
--- Comment #16 from Ben Beasley code@musicinmybrain.net --- (In reply to Maxwell G from comment #15)
I preferred the previous approach where you included the Python metadata. PyPI is the primary distribution channel, and I don't think including the Python package adds _too_ much extra complication. It seems strange to me to use the sdist but not build a Python package from it.
Do you like the original approach of having a separate python3-cramjam-cli package, with a fully-versioned dependency on the base package, to carry the metadata and the Python interpreter dependency?
Miro and Fabio, what do you think? I’m kind of taking a poll here. I think either approach (package metadata or don’t) is defensible, and neither approach is going to burden me too much.