Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567086
--- Comment #4 from Chen Lei supercyper@163.com 2010-03-10 07:56:00 EST --- (In reply to comment #3)
Hello Chen Lei! thanks for your comments:
- What do you mean "add subpackage info after %description"? Would you mind
writing a small example? (ie: %package devel Summary: Headers for VXL library Group: Development/Libraries Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} %description devel You should install this package if you would like to develop code based on VXL. -> Here I think you should add some more text to clarify <- )
It's not error, just a spec file standard. You see almost all spec files add subpackage info after %description, follow standard will increase the readability of spec file.
See http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/glibc/devel/glibc.spec?revision=1.4...
- As for the bundled libs:
- I've already removed jpeg png zlib tiff geotiff mpeg2
- v3p/netlib dependency not removed because of heavily modifications
- v3p/dcmtk: it exists an rpm package at http://dicom.offis.de/dcmtk.php.en but
there is none in yum and neither there is a review request. Should we try to add it as well?
- All of the following libraries are being switched off:
-DBUILD_OXL:BOOL=OFF \ -DBUILD_CORE_GEOMETRY:BOOL=OFF \ -DBUILD_CORE_IMAGING:BOOL=OFF \ -DBUILD_CORE_NUMERICS:BOOL=ON \ -DBUILD_CORE_PROBABILITY:BOOL=OFF \ -DBUILD_CORE_SERIALISATION:BOOL=OFF \ -DBUILD_CORE_UTILITIES:BOOL=OFF \ -DBUILD_CORE_VIDEO:BOOL=OFF \ because the main intent for this package was to allow InsightToolkit (which is blocked by this package review), my idea to speed up the approval was to disable these functionalities as they are not used in Insight Toolkit and require a significant effort to be decoupled and packaged as well. If you can help in packaging and enabling these libraries, I would be more than
We should packaging those libs, I can also help you to package some of them. Howerver, if I try to package those libs, I'll need some others to review my packages.