https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983160
--- Comment #8 from Olivier Lemasle o.lemasle@gmail.com --- Thanks for the reviews Jerry, and thanks Fabio for the comments.
- Regarding the license, you may have seen that I actually asked for clarification in the fedora-legal thread you mentioned. Actually, I remember I used "ASL 2.0 with exceptions" on other packages I maintain, after Neal Gompa's message telling "ASL 2.0 with exceptions" is sufficient and should "probably" be added to the list of valid licenses. However, I did not see the last replies on the thread at the time, so I've changed to simply "ASL 2.0 or MIT".
- I've also remove the codes of conduct, as they're indeed not documentation for the package.
Package updated: Spec URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-linux-raw-sys.spec SRPM URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-linux-raw-sys-0.0.28-1.fc35.src.r...