Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055
--- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer konrad@tylerc.org 2009-01-01 16:07:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
However, LICENSE only says this: """ The manual for Gfan is NOT distributed under the GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE. The manual may be freely redistributed but is not allowed to be changed. The manual may be removed from the software package. """
Does that violate Fedora guidelines? I don't think so.
"The manual is not allowed to be changed" is definitely non-free, so this part cannot be in Fedora: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ
""" Does Fedora permit anything under "Non-Free" licensing?
When it comes to software or fonts, the answer is definitely no. We strongly prefer that items classified as content (see Code Vs Content) are under a Free license, but we only require that they be freely distributable without restrictions. """
I think a manual is content as opposed to code and therefore freely distributable is ok.