Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492110
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Sailer t.sailer@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-03-29 16:41:03 EDT --- Thank you for taking the review!
I have updated the spec and srpm files: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libsigc++20-2.2.2-6.fc11.src.rpm http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libsigc++20.spec
The specfile is written in legible English, but... ... the WTF comment is a bit inapproriate and should preferably be removed, the $libdir/$packagename is a standard place for architecture dependent headers, so its presence is not surprising
You are completely right, I didn't understand this comment either. I've deleted it.
two files have questionable permissions and give rpmlint warnings (see above). If possible these two should be fixed by removing executable permissions.
Ok, I've removed the exec permissions. Now I would really like to know why my rpmlint hasn't found this...